The Script-Hall of Fame; this video seems pertinent to us right now.
Men rule what?
It has been a long time, if ever, since men have truly ruled the world.
Often times it is not the figurehead on the television you need to watch for. Nope, it is the ever so subtle eye movement to where the talking head looks at for permission to speak. Essentially, dominance is not always about being at the head of the table. Sometimes it is the quiet guy in the background casually letting every one know his bidding to be followed.
By the way; “The Man” these days seems to possess a vagina. As the Greeks supposedly say, the man is the head, but the woman the neck. Wherever the neck turns, the head does also.
And yet, the approved story of the past century we have heard is that men have ruled women with an iron fist since the first caveman learned two rocks could smash together. We also hear how we men have created this pandemic holocaust of violence on women from which they have no escape. How terrible of us; maybe I should look in my basement? I’m sure the poor imaginary dears I keep locked down there are hungry. I did not even know I had them; but I am told they are there none the less? It is an illogical, albeit a little sexist, ideological worldview. But who cares what I think? I am a man and therefore the oppressor of women for all time; so I’m told.
So who wears the pants in this family?
Rarely, in any era, was the husband the one who played hostess; usually the wife is the one who takes over at the household social events. The man is expected to grind it out in the street, workplace, war zone, and government; all without crying and failing to provide for his family. Then come home and play his part of husband, father, household handyman, ATM, bill payer; all why owning the BBQ in the summer. If the wife makes any money of her own; that’s hers too. As they say, “whats hers is hers; and whats yours is hers.”
In this regard, it has been customary we are told that a man would expect a home cooked meal on the table, a little time to read the paper or watch a sports game; and then spend time with his wife and kids before he went to bed and started the drudgery all over again. If he was lucky, he could oppress his wife in the bedroom; you know, if he gave her a back massage and she grudgingly rolled over to provide access to her cream filling. What an asshole right?
For example here is the traditional marital vows of men and women:
We are gathered together in the presence of this company to unite (Groom) and (Bride) in holy bonds of matrimony. I require and charge you both that if either of you know reason why you should not be so united, that you now speak or forever hereafter hold your peace.”
So who suffers actually?
So this seemingly normal state of affairs in what use to be known as traditional America is now viewed as “patriarchal oppression?” Honestly, this photo here explains a lot to me about how oppressed housewives are:
and later in old age:
Here is why; men view women not as tools for their growing oppression but their ability to provide for a family they know is theirs. It has traditionally, historically, logically been the best and most trusted form of societal bliss for thousands of years. A woman trades in access to sex, and her affection for access to his resources. Both promising to each other; and their in-laws that the family will be accessible to all interested parties.
Remember; you both said this:
Him-”With this ring, I thee wed, and with all my earthly possessions I thee endow.”
Her-”I give you this ring in token of my love, faith and loyalty.”
That doesn’t mean she does not control him though! Not even close; the game of women these days is social dominance/public victim-hood. This game is even more effective for women with the traditional vows above as the backdrop of the male point of view. She gets his stuff; he expects her love, faith(respect), and fidelity. Modern family law holds her to none of those things. The man, well, he will pay regardless!
To do this, women have to trick as many people as possible into thinking that they are helpless; not scheming and manipulative. Even the best of women, I theorize, manipulate men with the falsely expressed promise that delivery of acceptable outcomes for her benefit yields the fruit of female avarice towards his cock; and his alone. A man wants a woman who jealously defends him; and loves him as well. Sadly, with the advent of Marxist feminism; this love was just not meant to be.
What is feminism’s malfunction?
This societal bedrock has led to the stability of societies since forever; those who abuse it have tended to have dire outcomes (read about Carthage down below). However, feminism has this point of view that this system is “Patriarchy” and marriage was “patriarchy’s” way of holding women back.
Inculcate technology of the modern era into the mix; and feminism feels females are ready to break the societal mold; so they say. Leading us all into this sort of pussy worship in a golden age of human development where men can feel safe with their more feminine side at the home raising kids; and women can show those stupid men how technology, government, and innovation is really done! All with a flair for interior design, high school musicals, and everyone with a feel good feeling in tow who pulls the feminist line. The rest well, not so much.
Reproductive Technology made for a man; loathed by any woman.
There is a problem however; no where in history does it show women as truly oppressed solely for being women. What feminism has done is actually misconstrue the public image of female history and conflate it with monstrous ideals of self-hate, and the distrust of everything male. The historical narrative of men going down with the ship, and dying to defend women in war and duress be damned.
Also, the universe of empirical data in the form of men having invented basically everything is no indication in a feminist’s mind of having any value. It does not matter that men invented the pill, washing machines, better more comfortable homes, increasingly more efficient and better health care, and various other toys that benefit everyone; especially women. Nope, it was all oppression folks for the empowerment of male greed; and women can do it better.
A feminist needs no intervention; her belief is her rock of salvation! Truth, reason, empirical data or studies only possess merit if they support her worldview. Not to mention give her cash, and power over men.
Come on man; what’s the point?
I’m glad you asked, because their is a point to their ravenous avarice of the Federal Tax code; and the reproductive technology and laws.
THEY WERE NEVER INVENTED FOR THEM!
That’s right; I am saying that the pill, abortion, and a whole myriad of sexual related protections that seemingly fit only women; are not for them. They are for men!
Family law, completely unregulated adoption laws, unfettered and irresponsible abortions on demand have all been made legal for one purpose. To keep men in their holes like fox holes and graves that they have made for themselves at the behest of their wives and girl friends for thousands of years. White feather anyone?. This is the real reason in my mind male birth control is not here yet; and also why VAWA and other laws like it are passed so routinely.
History is truthfully more replete with examples of women father shopping, denying access to the kids, and generally controlling reproduction throughout history; false rape is a prime example. Whether you believe the Bible or not, the account of Potiphar’s wife falsely accusing an innocent man is nothing new. It has been around forever! The fact that it was such a well known phenomenon is counter to all of feminist theory. Women can be evil, let’s all wait for the next feminist slogan reporting that!
I can only wonder how many ancient Israelite men, and men from their neighboring countries, were falsely accused and then stonedor hung on ancient gallows (impaled)? It is fairly obvious why most of the feminist agendas take on history is to manipulate and confuse our children from a young age to reject anything that could help men. They have known since before the turn of last century that DNA/blood testing (in rape cases and illegitimate father shopping), fair legal laws in all courts, condoms, and a female birth control option would sound the death knell of female privilege. Indeed, without sex and children; most men and women have very little reason to find anything in common. What no one would have suspected is that they would go to these lengths out of fear to denigrate men so viciously.
It is not the end of marriage; merely the end of women controlling it and their desire to continue their gynocentric rule.
Imagine a world where men refuse marriage. Imagine it without our current technological advances, and you have an idea of what the suffragettes may have thought. Coupled with their idea that they could seize power over men through the state; and you have a lovely concoction of the depraved mind some of these women truly possessed.
Deception, avarice, Marxist government all have one thing in common. They kill people; and find ways to get the masses to justify it for them. Abortion, for example:
Children of Carthage
Today’s nations should learn a grim lesson from the way children were treated in ancient Carthage, and from the fate that befell the city. In 300BC, Carthage was the center of a rich trading empire, and was a rival of Rome. Its citizens were wealthy, cultured and educated, yet remarkably callous about taking human life. Unwanted orphans and widows were killed “to reduce the amount of poverty and suffering in the city” ( When Nations Die, Black, p. 164). Carthaginians burned thousands of their own children to appease their patron goddess, Tanet. Ancient writers report that frequent public sacrifices “took place in front of a bronze statue of the god, with arms outstretched over a blazing fire; the child slid down over the arms and fell” into the flames ( The Phoenicians and the West, Aubet, p. 211). The necropolis at Carthage contains more than 20,000 urns with charred remains of infants and children. This gruesome practice finally ended when the Romans besieged and destroyed Carthage in 146BC.
Historian Jim Nelson Black wondered how the murder of unborn children in modern societies is any different from the murder of children in ancient Carthage? He asked: “Isn’t the rite of abortion our culture’s sacrifice to the gods of materialism and greed? The Phoenicians killed many thousands of children… But in the entire history of Carthage or of Rome, they never killed 30 million in the name of “a woman’s right to control her own body” (Black, p. 166).
The media lavished much attention on the famous Roman Catholic nun, Mother Teresa, but only infrequently reported her stinging rebukes of contemporary society. Mother Teresa likened abortion to “a war against the child, a direct killing of the innocent child, murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?… Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. This is why the greatest destroyer of peace and love is abortion” ( ibid., pp. 214–215).
Carthage continued its barbaric practice of murdering children until the day it was destroyed. Will our society today, which permits far greater evil, do the same?
—Douglas S. Winnail
Anytime in history, regardless of gender, where human beings can let their personal avarice, deceit, and sexual degeneracy run rampant is a breeding ground for destruction of all kinds. Contrary to feminist ideologues point of view, the sexual revolution has not freed us; but enslaved us!
I sense their death grip on the male birth control option is the US governments personal stake that this line they will never cross; for the day they do is the day we end as a nation. Men will have the unfettered ability to have sex as much as possible with no consequences. Marriage will plummet to its final death, women forced to work on an equal footing with men will falter in the workplace far more than succeed; and men will rule over them like a pimp running his”escort service.”
We may have neglected to read history from a objective point of view; but I don’t think early feminists did the same. I think they saw a hundred years ago that the writing was on the wall. Men were about to be set free from the bondage of female restraint; and it scares the hell out of them. The problem for women is they do not think logically in aggregate as a gender; a few do, most don’t.
Most think with their feelings; and their female hind brain must have kicked into overdrive when they saw that men were working out of the home; and her field of view. Thus, what her knowledge of men working with no women around to scold them would lead to; the woman of the early 1900s flipped out. Men, with their innovative prowess left to idle without her input on what she felt he should do with it; would take the industrial revolution’s legacy to an inevitable conclusion.
Ladies and Gentlemen; Elvis has left the homestead; for good.
Men are leaving, all over the world, since the marital climate is no longer palatable to their consumption. Indeed, men have access to the one thing women offered before (sex) in spades (literally bad women who don’t care what they do with their bodies). Now men can use their creative ability, personal wealth, and sole ambitions to pursue life as they see fit. There is going to be a lot more women at D-Bag’s Manboob’s place celebrating their cats.
What made women of that era think that doubling down on men with old school traditional enslavement they claimed to hate; while giving themselves access to every lap of luxury with the ability to leave whenever they pleased was a great idea is a shaming indictment of feminine avarice. Not to mention stupidity. The current claim of “equality” is the bastard offspring of the ages in ideological thought. That is an abortion I could agree with; too bad for women it is thousands of years too late.
Masculinity is under fire; the technology of the modern era is why. It will liberate us all as men from female oppression.