One of the things that set a good strategist apart from all the rest is their Endgame Strategy. The movement is getting bigger, and although I can’t declare victory imminent yet, I can say it is very likely time for men to stop and ponder what our goals and focus should be as we proceed against the destructive forces arrayed against us. Feminists and their pimp the government will not just stand by and watch as we take their sacred cash cows of consumerism, tax funded supplements, benefits exclusive to women; and the ability to rake men into war and enslavement. All at the expense of our kids being held hostage!
Let’s face it; our collective realization must be that those behind the curtain supporting feminists and other “unions,” are constantly scheming; and they have shown no moral compass, or lack of will to destroy others for cash. No matter how young; fetus to the elderly. The altar of the almighty dollar demands sacrifice; and these heathens put the Aztecs to shame.
We need to understand that we have come a long way; but it takes more than brute force to win this. So much more in fact, that we need to outline some goals. We cannot defeat feminism without something to replace it, and its destructive ideologues. We must be able to present a dynamic, and well thought out alternative that does not merely mimic the history of feminists in society; namely demanding the same that women get. We claim to defend what marriage stood for, or at least claim a desire for a new form (marriage 3.0); maybe it is time we decide just what that means?
For starters, we need to make sure that after we defeat our opposition, failing by leaving our society’s microscope looking at us wondering what we are going to do next. Then fail to provide an adequate show.
To answer this we need to look at what marriage answered in the past, and not present them as historical talking points, but real, practical, sound advice for people to lead their own lives. Both men and women have to have a plan to follow that is established; not a communist five year plan then divorce like we have now.
1. Marriage is a cure for our nation’s ailments; but it must be instituted without government institution; only the regulation of disputes. This is very different than what we have now believe me.
Fathers and Families did an expose the past few days about how family is a resource, and safe harbor in the turbulent waves of life thrown at us sometime. With all the uncertainty befalling us, we need to present this alternative as it naturally allows people a place to stay.
The thing is feminists have destroyed the other aspect that families had to protect their own; shame when we get out of line, and leadership in tough times as they most likely overcame it in their youth. This cannot be overemphasized enough. Families close together, and negotiating with, and collaborating with other families through marriage is not oppression; but wise, practical living for all societies. Feminists are stupid; their handling of this should be evident to all by now.
Families are impacted by divorce and loss of access to their “collective offspring.” This is just another way I feel government has exercised control over its citizens; and why it can’t be trusted.
In my family, we have a wise old matriarch in her 90s. She raised her three sons strong, and they have achieved great success. She has amazing family photos trust me; I have one at my desk while I type this. To be fair, my grandfather passed over ten years ago; and she is still going strong but it must be hard. They were married for almost seven decades! Who do you think people of our family of any age run to in time of need for guidance and advice? Yeah, that’s right; the wise matriarch. This is no different than a patriarch, or patriarch and matriarch leading their brood from their collective experience to ensure their legacy and offspring’s survival.
Yet feminists have largely succeeded in their campaign to destroy this sacred institution; and our elderly are stripped of their proper place into retirement homes to die without their knowledge and advice freely available. Our children’s future is heavily ridden with debt; and mountains of uncertainty. Social Security, Obamacare, and MEDICARE/MEDICAID sound familiar to anyone now?
In times past, a house would have as much as four (in some cases 5) generations living in it. The confidence and skill sets of these kids were superior in many ways after adjusting for the “social inflation” of technology and ever increasing government contempt for the privacy of its citizen’s rights. Yet given the same public “offerings,” these kids of times past would have crushed our brood of prison bound single-mother-hell spawn adrift with no moral moorings of their own. The former would naturally protect the government it distrusted. This leads me to my next point about responsibility.
2. When one wields power, they have certain obligations. If you have never thought about it; you have most likely taken for granted any position of influence you have ever had. You see, in order to have power in this universe, and wield it responsibly; you have to couple it with responsibility.
In our society today, we are like the guy who buys a monster truck; and then never uses it. Why buy something if you are never going to use it, or even display it? What is the point of having power; if you are going to do nothing with it positive or negative? At least a comic book villain has ambition; our youth today, and our future leaders, are adrift. They could have the powers of superman; and their sole focus would be playing video games, and picking up useless chicks.
In other words: Power=Responsibility, and Responsibility=Power.
If one becomes a parent, they are a parent for life! Just because I am out of the home, does not mean I don’t ask my parents for advice or counsel when I am having a hard time. That is their job, as their offspring they are “responsible” for me since I am their legacy. I might have left the home; but only a fool or an orphan by their parent’s choice can shame their own mini-creators. I don’t disagree with the ancient Biblical teaching of “Honor thy father and Mother.” Look at what the lack of it has done to us here. Also, in a marriage, the mother and father of your spouse become like second parents; since they have a collective interest in our offspring to support and care for them.
As a society driven by divorce; we have messed up. I pray our Creator still has some time on His clock before punishment. Believer or not; we need to correct this deficiency. We must realize family is more than just husband and wife; it is two whole extended families acting like biological cells making up the larger organism of society itself; feminism is its cancer.
3. A really important thing to cover as well is the ideological make-up entwining the genders and work. Feminism has used this to devastating effect, and a simpleton’s response on the matter will be drowned out by the four decades long cacophony of feminist nonsense passing for economic theory.
We need to counter this in a way that advances both genders simultaneously allowing those women who want to work the ability to do so while not depriving them of access to child birth. We have something now that resembles a hodgepodge of different whiny feminist thoughts combined in to one giant 50-foot-Voltron sized idiot’s economy of conflicting communist ideals; all in desperate need of a lifetime supply mega-pads. Seeing as this giant Franken-witch is in menopause; could it please kindly acknowledge to the public it can produce no more ideological offspring, the one good one it did produce in females being able to work, is not that great and we can do without. If someone would also be so kind as to remind her that she, and the rest of us, would all be better off if she removed herself from the ideological gene-pool and took her mental hell spawn with her back to where they came from.
So please; “Hotron assemble” and get packing. Really, take everything of yours with you including your physical manifestation of Joe Biden. Besides a fifty foot cyborg carcass is nothing for kids to look at anyways; and it’s a health risk. Remember, Best Interest of the Child right?
4. Ownership of roles needs to make a comeback no matter what.
Okay, I get it already; women and men should share chores and childcare. So what; your gender feminist women’s study professor neglected to mention (or maybe is just stupidly unawares?) that this has always been the case. Do you think that when the farmer came home in times past that his wife dutifully, and fearfully, neglected to tell him to change a diaper after he had been working from sun up, to sun down? Me either, I also doubt that many men did not want to be actively involved in child care; they were just physically exhausted half the time taking care of producing something so the family had food for his wife to prepare. This is just one example; there are thousands of examples through classical history even, of fathers helping to raise their young. Feminism sold you a bad deal; and now you have to make up for it. It does not have to be bad though sweetheart; your man just might make it worth it for you even if you choose to work yourself. We need most of you to work in this economy anyways; but that is where the rubber meets the road isn’t it?
Work is tiring, and you know why your wayward sisters opt out of work so often; child care is an awesome gift, and responsibility; and if they “have to frivorce” they get everything. So you keep putting your nose to the grindstone, and wonder when your “alpha captain” will sail in with the vessel when your metaphorical ship of wedded bliss comes in. Yeah, you should read what happens to women on the exiting side of the cock carousel; but I digress.
You have to realize that you want a partner, not a combatant in an unnecessary gender war in your home. Well, here is a thought; don’t make it one! How about this; you both take “ownership” of the roles you excel at, and teach each other how to be better at your individual strengths. Thereby compensating over each other’s weaknesses’, making you stronger as a couple maximizing your collective strengths?
I know you don’t have to say it: I’m a genius.
Look, if you can’t retile the roof; I don’t hear the ACLU making lawsuits on that. However, I do hear a lot of women pissing and moaning everywhere under the sun about men not doing the cooking, the cleaning, the childcare; but also hear the same voices demanding the roof be fixed, the outlet replaced, taking the kids outside to wrestle as you watch HGTV.
If you have taken ownership of something; don’t piss at the sun because your man doesn’t possess the psychic ability to ascertain when you want a break just friggin ask him. Men have an innate desire to provide for their family and showcase their physical strength and stamina. You should know you have been tooling enough men for cash prizes and free dinners over the years to know better. Enough said.
5. Remake all contract law to carry the weight of a business contract.
If I make a deal with my wife’s family to care, provide, care for, and protect her; her family should damn well have the legal recourse to take it out of my hide if I fail to carry my end of the “bargain.” The problem today obviously is that men don’t have the same.
There is a reason for this, and it ties in with the other points a little bit. The reason is; if families have a say over their collective offspring, they have the “right” to legally hold you and your family accountable; and be held accountable.
This last piece is how we can use all the rest to turn the tables in the end game.
When they (feminists) counter; we can do to them like Democrats trap Republicans in Congress. We will need to accuse them of being anti-family, anti-elderly, anti-child, anti-woman, and anti-male; and pour the burning coals on their heads while they squirm under our intellectual weight. This is actually pretty necessary and still distinct from the other points.
Combining all of these threads together like a business contract limits government to a true third party, and enlarges the family to a “trust fund” that the government cannot interfere too much with. You see, if your house in a divorce is used by your entire family on your side, and not just yourselves (your ex-spouse and you); they cannot justify giving it to an individual at the expense of so many. Just like it is difficult for them to tear a business up and split up so many jobs.
This is why they had to destruct common notions of family, and immediately tied divorce to just the “two involved.” Reversing that more towards the family may be attractive enough to the public as it limits government, counteracts divorce, binds family ties much stronger; and limits the autonomy of individuals to deprive the family on either side of the divorce. Not to mention it propagates a social stigma that you don’t go against your family! That means both sides, and you honor your word; or you are left in the cold.
This may not be as hard to sell as you think; we already force people into this using business. Family is family business. The law already limits family feuds, so making the government a truly disinterested third party means they will read a quick settlement rather than fight whole families. It is the wording of the law that is key to limiting what an actually happen!
6. Last, get rid of the incentives of lawyers by winning elections; and ousting corrupt lawyers like ADA Mary Kellet in Maine.
Essentially, this topic could go for pages but I won’t. These are just some ideas to argue about amongst ourselves to collectively start focusing on future events so we intentionally shape them; not come up on them by accident.
What do you think?