FathersandFamilies.org has yet again got another state involved in the opposition to the Domestic Violence Industry and its socialist-financial grip on the destruction of children, and their fathers, and their father’s families.
Once again, we see an underdog in the force for good go against a well entrenched fascist controlled state NGO that is more concerned with the finance it can garner on the federal and state tax payer dime; then the supposed victims they only claim to represent.
Ask Governor Pat McCrory To Support Equally Shared Parenting in NC.
The facts have been around for decades; and yet I get it folks! Really I do.
You wake up, maybe after a long weekend with friends or family; or going to another grueling day at work, or nowadays in search of work. You get up, eat breakfast; and get in your car on the way to pump some gas you may or may not be able to afford. Then off to the rat race of working, self-employer or otherwise; to bring home some money for whatever ambitions you have in life; be they family, business, or both.
Then, back home you come to either a family and the stress and love that brings; or to an empty house just trying to figure out how you are going to get by in the next day. May I make a suggestion? It is free, and only costs time; you can spend some money if you can afford it.
Go to the www.fathersandfamilies.org website and either read up on what you can do like petitioning a corrupt politician to let them know they are being watched; or if you can afford it, donate some money to what these amazing people do everyday of their lives on your behalf; be you man or woman. I am unemployed and managed to scrap up a few dollars, and I am amidst a family court battle on top of being unemployed. I don’t say that for praise, or to guilt you; I just believe in this group that much. No one should have to go through what my child and I are going through; no one!
We need everyone on this to recognize what feminists actually are! Internationally we have gotten this from groups like Femen:
Here is their calling card if you don’t believe me:
See, now both of us have somethign to be thankful for. Who knows, maybe you can get some ideas from a real communist!
You need to see what is really going on, and who is really one of the most dynamic causes of our financial fiasco who will blindly throw us off the fiscal cliff besides lead us there! They march hand in hand with the bankers and politicians who got us here in the first place. If you think this will not affect you; it already has! Read on Social Security Title IV-D section 458, this is only ONE portion of it. Theirs is a diabolical plan that was set in motion in the sixties; and is now firmly entrenched. These brave men and women at fathersandfamilies.org are doing an important, vital, and bold work.
God Speed!
36 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
freebird
November 25, 2012 at 5:23 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
F&F and RADAR are the only two groups I know of making headway in the political arena.
This is what needs to be done,it is priority #1 for men.
The female high ranking Treasury official who commented upon seizing %100 of a man’s Social Security fund to pay for imputed child support said,roughly:
“If they’ve fathered a child they deserve to die cold and destitute living in the backseat of a car.”
Changing the misandrist laws is the only real hope men have,the President in 2010 attempted to make a UN council for women that would overlord misandrist policies worldwide.
This is a real battle,If I guy can send one buck or more he should do that,myself included.
Send anything,anything at all,and consider it the best investment for yourself and your sons.(If you have any)
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 25, 2012 at 6:27 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Yeah, I agree and I did not know she said that. Will look into it; not that it matters. Obama is something else man; how he can get away with so much and still get voted in is the truest indictment of us as a whole in America. We are truly on our way down hill. How much we know of his administration already; must be the tip fo the iceberg against what we don’t know.
Care to dip your face in the icy waters with me and see what lurks in the cold deep of DC politics?
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 25, 2012 at 6:45 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Can you send me the link? Lael Bernard; is that her name?
ray
November 25, 2012 at 7:28 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
these groups do good work agreed
but the u.s. is already 20 years past the point of significant change by political means
the DV industry is like the family-law industry — far too profitable to be reformed
on top of the huge financial incentives, the government sees it as a bonus — not as a deficit — that the lives of The Evil Males are destroyed — just as millions of women see a man forced into a cage, or a car, by them as a VICTORY and a JOY — not something negative
politics will not move these people an inch, but only retrench them in their greed and hate
the quote by the treasury official isn’t even an extremist voice — that is the voice, and the sentiment, of half the population of this nation, and of nearly all the powerful political/economic people in the nation, gleefully announcing it will make endless war on maleness
25 years ago, when i was working in the law, i spent a few (horrible) days working at a family law firm in a major city
seeing how their huge office suites were plushly outfitted, the fat sows sauntering arrogantly down the corridors, and the flood of money that rolled through the doors every week, made it clear to me that anti-male laws and policies would never be overturned by political means
and that was just ONE law firm in ONE city! lol
the matriarchy may thrown f and f a bone once in awhile, to make folks think there’s some chance at fixing things — but it’s only a dodge, a delaying tactic
the u.s. matriarchy will end up being changed, all right, but not by appeal to the very politicians and government officials who profit from it, and hide behind its false authority while doing evil to boys and men
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 25, 2012 at 11:32 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I view your comment like the game clue when you make the final accusation; and “I can’t prove you wrong.”
I have two problems, seemingly unrelated; yet I most likely agree with you on politics inability to change the current system. I’m just tired of waiting.
If you are right; and it is just a stalling tactic I’m unsure if their effrots matter anything more than steeling the resolve of those who win as I feel feminists were saying the same as us in the 80s?
The second problem is this: the current regimes of lawyers will most likely be outdone by lack fo court cases by 2030? Maybe later?
Now all that remains is how long it takes for you to open th course little envelope and see if you have the right weapon, room, and asshole?
The fact is, real political change, is won in the trenches over a long period of time. The question is if and when the mens movement gets off the ground; can they stop us?
Molly
November 25, 2012 at 9:02 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Good post. You have my support, of course!
Glorious Bastard, thank you for visiting my silly blog.
Molls.
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 25, 2012 at 11:34 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Your welcome
freebird
November 26, 2012 at 3:07 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
“It’s perfectly fine for a person who failed to pay their child support to end up penniless and living in their car, and to die that way.”
Found at
http://www.angrybearblog.com/2012/02/les-miserables-social-security.html
You may have to track it a bit more from there,good luck!
freebird
November 26, 2012 at 3:15 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I’m doing the groundwork even as I write this,the exact quote yields quite a few google results,so far most just say “high ranking treasury official” but I will keep at it,have lots of time!
freebird
November 26, 2012 at 3:31 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Ok,all roads lead to a quote from the National Consumer Law Center,citing an email address source:
msaunders@nclc.org
I’m going to email this addy ask whom the quote is attributed to.
Doubtful as to a response,but will see!
freebird
November 26, 2012 at 3:36 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I just sent the email to the addy above,copy of text=
“Hello,and thanks for all your good work!
I’m looking for the person who said
““It’s perfectly fine for a person who failed to pay their child support to end up penniless and living in their car, and to die that way.”
This quote has been referenced to your email address,and I was wondering who the “high ranked treasury official” is?
Can you tell me the source?”
Will let you know if and when I get a response.
freebird
November 26, 2012 at 3:45 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I think the name you where looking for is Lael Brainard,her bio at the treasury site is
http://www.treasury.gov/about/organizational-structure/Pages/brainard-e.aspx
So far no confirmation she is the source of the quote.
But check out the bio.
freebird
November 26, 2012 at 3:47 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Here’s the page to all the Treasury officials,it will take some time to look at the all,if I can.
But of course no way to track the quote,so far.
The MSM has a way of making these sort of things dissapear.
freebird
November 26, 2012 at 3:48 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Whoops!
http://www.treasury.gov/about/organizational-structure/Pages/officials.aspx
freebird
November 26, 2012 at 3:56 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Still sniffing about.
This site lists all the SS trustees,and also has a quote from Rosie Rios;
““It’s about time, actually,” said Rosie Rios, the United States treasurer, in an interview. “We’ve been offering electronic deposit for over 35 years — already eight in 10 people have their funds deposited electronically. This is really a great way for people to have a safe, easy and convenient way to get their funds.”
I’m doing google searchs on officials names just before the quote in quotes.
freebird
November 26, 2012 at 5:17 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Assuming the quote happened,and factoring in many variables I got it down to two suspects,Lael Brainard and Rosie Rios.Rosie is the actual Sec Tres.
Both women are active in The National Council for Research for women,and both work with the UN’s womens foreign policy group.
Given Rosie’s top position it would seem she would be more discreet.
Lael Looks like the best fit for the quote,she looks a lot like Sandra Locke,Clint Eastwood’s partner in many movies including the one where her character assassinates the hoodlums who raped her in her youth.The same wild look about the eyes.
I should have some time this winter and will see if I can dig out the foundations and NGO’s that are funding the anti-male domestic violence and raype hysteria in the media.
The rabbit hole runs deep,Sec State is involved,along with many pro-rad fem sub organizations,directly linked to making war in the middle east to promote feminism.Or vicey versey.
Icy waters indeed.Very chilling.
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 26, 2012 at 9:12 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Hey old boy, I tried to email you. Either way, you got great ideas, but in order to publically isolate a official of her stature who is gone every 2-8 years will be extremely difficult. Essentially it is a smear campaign. We would need federal judges to give a damn; considerng they may want a “judicial appointment” from the free loader in chief-I won’t hold my breath. The best thing is making her dirty laundry a viral concern. We both know the administration she works for will have “no comment” even if we could make it national.
I think it best we tie her into several items; because the average taxpayers are unincumbered in family court. They are unaware. Many men have tried and failed to mount this mountain to public awareness and failed bitterly.
Our public is increasingly corrupt; and often in favor of what she says. We would need some severly damning evidence unrelated to go after someone like that.
ray
November 26, 2012 at 8:06 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
youre not more tired of waiting than i am, bro, i merely made a comment about taking action in the wrong dirrection (attempting to change the matriarchy by “inches” by nibbling at politics)
“The second problem is this: the current regimes of lawyers will most likely be outdone by lack fo court cases by 2030? Maybe later?”
the regimes of lawyers (and US by far has the most in the world) will NOT go “out of business” due to “lack of court cases”
women lawyers (thus, soon judges) have been pouring out of the law schools for forty years, under the usual female-only scholarships, etc.
you do not have until 2030 LOL!
the huge Just-sis sistem of lawyers, “judges,” court officials, prison guards, probation officers and on and on MUST HAVE someone to prosecute . . . if theres nobody to prosecute or rape in family court, then their jobs go away, and their jobs are pretty easy money, govt-guaranteed in most cases, i know cuz i had one
given this, do you imagine the american female is gonna be the choice for court-fodder? probly not eh? the choice as always is males, i.e., Some Other Guy (except me!) . . . that means endless “laws” and endless warrants and prosecutions making sure that there are sufficient warm (male) bodies to keep the Sistem chugging along
there will never be a “lack of cases” boss — theyll just make sure youre a “criminal” or find another way to process you, just as they have the past three decades
2030? in 20 years fatherhood and masculinity will be criminalized and crushed to the point where it effectively wont exist — our government, as per the quote above, makes it very clear what its plans are towards amerikan males
i support your men’s movement, dont get me wrong, and fathers-and-families, along with a few others, do great work, and i’m thankful for them — but this beast cant be overcome with politics
“The fact is, real political change, is won in the trenches over a long period of time.”
you sound like a v young guy!
the fact is, there is no such thing as “real political change”
politics is the art of keeping things from changing . . . right from nimrod’s bab/assyrian empires, to the present moment
cheers
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 26, 2012 at 9:06 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
My favorite part of you’re comment: “the fact is, there is no such thing as “real political change”-I agree wholeheartedly with this. I am not saying human politics will change; just hoping the masters of it will.
I agree with most of what you say; save two things. Also, a few things I think we could agree on.
A. You have to assume that males will take this forever; I don’t see that happening; especially if the government fails. That is another assumption we make; this government will still be here by 2030. I strongly suspect it will; but the way we, or namely our women, spend anything is possible at this point. Every role is chaning from the last couple thousand years; at least in this country. I think the question is not will we go back; but how? Women today because of technology got a taste (at least they think) of what feminists and their government masters have told them being a male is. All the “priviledge” without the responsibility aftertaste in most cases.
B. The other thing; you are assuming that men will answer the Nation’s every call. We are at the tail end of 200 years of brutal fighting all over the world (where men, largely white, have taken the largest death toll); the last 100 of which this country has taken the leader’s role in. I can’t say with absolute certainty that men (of all demographics) will continue with the current track of things. Especially with more women taking military roles that are non-military roles; yet take up a financially valuable position without actually performing it in most cases; just taking the benefits and running.
The fear is people in this country not wanting to be the leaders in the world any further than we have come. Fiscally, we can’t afford it really.
One last thing; I agree that by our nature we are the most favorable target for these draconian policies; I don’t feel it will ever switch to women. I do feel that if men start to vote for certain topics en masse that are beneficial to them; the government will take note. Whether they balk, or follow remains to be seen. I know from personal experience how the government can use different forms of media to devastating effect; and keeping everyone divided.
The problem is in assuming it will last forever; and that young men, many of whom have seen why it hapened will not run into the men’s movment eventually. Whether by what they have seen their parents go through, or experienced themselves; women are also avoidng it now. Basically, I feel different from you that the men’s movement is here to stay; feminist’s power is waning, and eventually they have to answer the three questions they have been avoiding for decades:
1: If DV is soo bad, and your incompetence has been even worse in the face of it; why do we kee you? Have you been lying? Their favorite politicians will turn on them when conveninet possibly, or new younger ones with a fresh agenda harmful to us all; essentially a polticized version of te hook-up culture already heavily rooted in college cultures everywhere.
2: Entitlement spending, largely initiated by the baby boomers will have to be accpeted by my generation and the oncoming one. I don’t see that happening, which means that the Ponzi scheme of Social Security is going to get a deep, and thorough look. I suspect that politicians will try to change it before their dirty laundry gets aired. Especially as more politicians “get made aware” of our movement.
3: Eventually, this is already happening, feminists are going to find it ever more difficult to call themselves victims as the men’s movement raises awareness of just how entitled women really are. Between the ever burgeoning population of grown up children victimized by divorce, CPS/DHHS, adoptions, foster care, and single moms who deny the children’s fathers; coupled with the vast majority of women who bought into feminists terrible bill of sale awakening to their plight after the age of 36 as childrearing is concerned. Something has to give. I doubt it will be a return to Marriage 1.0- but a slow progression to 3.0 where the state has to convince a population that severely distrusts why it should be involved. Contrary to popular belief; there is very likely a men’s mariiage strike. The statistics are just not in yet; and maybe won’t be truly apparent for five more years?
Also, cheers to you; I thoroughly enjoy your POV. Thanks for the comment!
freebird
November 27, 2012 at 12:11 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Thanks for the reply.
I did get a reply to my email!
Exact copy of text=
”
I cannot tell you. I am sorry.
Margot Saunders
Of Counsel, National Consumer Law Center
1001 Connecticut Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20036
202 452 6252 ext. 104
msaunders@nclc.org
http://www.nclc.org”
As for my email,it is fictitious.
If you’ve got a contact email I will send you a post from my home addy which I’ve had for 14 years and never have changed it yet,due to keeping my contact list very,very small.
I could post the real mail addy in the comment line,but I’m not sure who-all can get into that?
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 27, 2012 at 1:37 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I figured, no worries man. It is cool you got a reply at least. LOL
Molls
November 27, 2012 at 12:30 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Isn’t there a site where you can register bigots, like this penis envy bitch?
http://register-her.com/index.php?title=Nicole_Fabian-Weber_–_Bigot
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 27, 2012 at 1:38 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Yes, the best place is to go with the guys from a A voice for Men. They have a link at the top that appears periodically called just that “register-her.com” I think. They have a hall of shame that is not any where near as extensive as it could be.
"Molls"
November 27, 2012 at 1:56 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Glorious Bastard
There is a long list really, many for false accusations. There should be more women registered there who just say disgusting things.
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 27, 2012 at 2:50 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Hmmmm, the problem I have with that is that by trying to do as feminists do; namely, restricting free speech is anathema to the Men’s Movement in the long term. I personally feel it would be better to just keep letting them hang themselves until we have more internet news media to be the type of journalists women like Katie Couric wish they were; and beg them to explain themselves in front of a camera.
Eventually the so called “wheels of Justice” turn. The problem for most of us is we don’t live that long. Be of good cheer though! The Internet has taken what normally woud hve been forty years 30 years ago and made it possible to blow up almost overnight; usually less than ten years.
The thing is the media silence. Though apparently this may be changing?
"Molls"
November 27, 2012 at 3:11 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
You don’t have to silence. Just hold them up to shame and laughter.
Laugh at silly women, especially feminists.
I try to do that at my blog.
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 27, 2012 at 4:53 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I honestly hope that is the case.
freebird
November 27, 2012 at 12:08 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Here’s a big little something lurking under the icy waters of DC, do a search on the phrase:
“The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs “
freebird
November 27, 2012 at 12:16 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton convened the first ever Global Chiefs of Mission Conference. This will be the first time U.S. Ambassadors will gather from around the world simultaneously. A principal aim of the conference will be to prepare for the implementation of the recommendations in the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR)
The QDDR provides a blueprint for elevating American civilian power to better advance our national interests and to be a better partner to the U.S. military.
This historic first-ever meeting of all the US ambassadors at once was conducted in secret and enjoyed a full media blackout.
freebird
November 27, 2012 at 12:29 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Apologies for the multiple posts, I post this stuff as I find it again.
From 2010
UN Creates What May Become a Billion Dollar Agency for Radical Feminism
NEW YORK, July 8 (C-FAM) Last Friday the General Assembly voted to consolidate four separate United Nations (UN) bodies dedicated to womens issues into one new gender equality entity called UN Women. The resolution capped a victory for radical feminists who lobbied for years for the new entity and is the latest in an overall push to bring womens issues even more onto the UN agenda.
After four years of sometimes harsh negotiations, member states agreed on simplifying the disjointed efforts of four UN offices dedicated to womens issues; the United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), the International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (INSTRAW), Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW) and the Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women (OSAGI).
The framework for UN Women is the Beijing Platform for Action, which calls for an end to discrimination against women especially highlighting education, employment, political participation and human rights. An Under-Secretary-General appointed by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon will head the new body and member states are calling for a prompt appointment before the General Assembly meets in September. Many are speculating that former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet will be chosen. Bachelet is a socialist who promoted reproductive health and womens rights during her political career. The Under-Secretary-General will hold a 4-year term with a possibility of one renewable term.
The Gender Equality Architecture Reform (GEAR) campaign, a coalition of radical feminist groups and abortion advocates, has relentlessly lobbied to create a UN super-agency to deal with womens issues. Charlotte Bunch, executive director of the Centre for Women’s Global Leadership and the leading advocate of the GEAR campaign, said, We have high expectations for this new agency [...] The coalition of womens groups and other social justice, human rights and development organizations that played a pivotal role in this effort will now turn its efforts toward ensuring that the new body has the human and financial resources necessary to succeed.
The new body will be governed by an executive board consisting of 41 members: 10 African, 10 Asian, 4 Eastern European, 5 Western European/Other States, 6 Latin American/Caribbean, and 6 from contributing countries, of which 4 seats are allocated to the largest donor countries and 2 seats to donors from developing countries.
Some member states have expressed concern that the cultures and objectives of recipient countries would not be respected. The resolution reaffirms that there is no one size fits all approach to development assistance, reflecting what is generally a split between rich industrial states where radical feminism holds sway and poorer countries where basic necessities must be met.
http://www.c-fam.org/publications/pub_d … sp?id=1660
There’s more offices for women at the UN,as mentioned above,as noted,many State Dept and Treasury fems are active in these.
Will hold off on posting more,will try to present an actual article before x-mas outlining the over-structure+ background players that form consensus.
There are literally hundreds of rad-fem organizations and those that fund them.
Quite a challenge.
Thanks for the public space brother.
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 27, 2012 at 1:03 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
You have been doing some work. Honestly, I have still been digging on your NGOs; and been lookin at some of the financial aspects between IMF and the Fed, Europe and the US. Also, I don’t believe China will ever be a threat to us but a giant land behemoth that might shake its giant fist at the middle east.
"Molls"
November 28, 2012 at 1:13 am (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I wish there was more I could do to undermine my feminist sisters, GB.
You probably think my blog is too rude, but I would be happy if you would consider blogrolling me. You could put me under a special Chicks category!
Molls
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 28, 2012 at 5:34 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I honestly thought about it; and I have to say no. The reason is simple, what I write about does not relate to your blog. I aim to contribute “written, video, and Men’s Movement content” to the Men’s Movement discourse. I welcome you to the site, but in order to answer your question, it has to be no at this time. Though I appreciate your thoughtfulness, your blog has only pictures, mainly, and the pictures largely consist of nude women. The demographic I aim to write to would be understandably put off by that. In the future, when you are writing written content; I will take a closer look.
Trust me, I know writing is hard; and a lot of people take various opinions on any blog. I cannot allow my blogroll to consist of only pictures. You need to write something. I encourage all writers, and bloggers to come; but my audience is one of people looking to make headway against feminism. When you are actually writing something, then we can talk. As you can see on my blog roll, I have several bloggers on there; some of whom I disagree with. Yet they write great material; and I encourage the differences of opinion. Right now, you have pictures, and they are in the nude; this will detract from my chosen audience. I understand if you disagree; but for right now, that is my decision.
Good luck Molls, on whatever decision you make.
"Molls"
November 28, 2012 at 7:38 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I understand GB.
I am not offended because I am very supportive of men but I am not a clear writer. But I will see what I can do. My blog is trying to make men feel good and feminists look silly (not that hard!)
The other thing I want to do is put supportive comments on men’s blogs. I hope you don’t mind me doing that here sometimes.
Molls
El Bastardo Glorioso!
November 28, 2012 at 8:33 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I appreciate your understanding; and I want you to feel free to comment here. If you read my 411 page you would see what I mean. I understaand you want the blog traffic; we all do. However, if you really want to make a difference you have to wield your mind like a literary Jedi. The real feminists out there in Australia will use your blog as is like a tool to paint women who support us as abused idiots that we will only use for sex. If on the other hand, you write content on top of the photo articulating exctly how your photo humiliates them; you will get a lot more laughter at their response!
Cheers Molls; stop by anytime.
"Molls"
November 28, 2012 at 8:50 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
Yes, I think I understand what you are saying GB.
I will try.
Mainly I want to amuse guys. And help their morale.
Molls